The log Statistical Papers, with editorial workplace at the University of Dortmund rejects all manuscript submissions in the event that writers usually do not cite documents out of this Springer-published log. The editors claim it’s perhaps perhaps not about effect element rigging.
Every so often, experts publishing their work with book encounter a request from editors to cite some random previous documents from exact same log. Why? One explanation: the impact is raised by it element. In reality, for many journals it really is perhaps the rule that is unofficial such journal-self-citations are required, or your paper will soon be refused. Some researchers abide ahead of time, which will make editors pleased. Many other people have trouble with the style that they find unethical. The German editor of this Springer log Statistical Papers will show you for your requirements right right right here why here is the scientifically correct and way that is perfectly objective run a log.
A discussion was raised on Twitter recently, for the duration of which neither the log maybe perhaps not the editor had been called.
Mark Hayter, teacher of medical at University of Hull in UK and a log editor himself, tweeted:
“A PhD student of mine possessed a paper accepted – one condition of acceptance ended up being that she ratings her recommendations and includes any relevant present documents through the journal that is accepting”
Then he included the log was “Not predatory. Distinguished journal, person in COPE and from a sizable,international publishing house” as well as specified that “They asked her to examine her sources and can include ‘recent, relevant’ documents through the accepting Journal. No particular documents had been suggested“. Ended up, Hayter had not been alone with this experience:
A reviewer ( perhaps not editor) as soon as told us to include citations from that log during my modification. a journal that is top. Very strange. I acquired in the practice of incorporating a few journal cites to wherever I’m submitting and nearly forget to consider the ethics. This will be waking me up.
More anecdotes arrived, like that one through the certain part of medication:
Indeed, a method to falsely impact that is inflate.
There is another cardiology that is international historically that insisted you cite their ethics declaration (posted as being a paper).
It absolutely was cited a great deal, their impact relocated from circa 2 to over 6 in 36 months. #gaming #unethical
A lot of the replies had been critical, such as this advice through the Hindawi research integrity manager Matt Hodgkinson:
For many we all know, the writers could have valued the Twitter outrage after which just did exactly just what the editor said and quoted some random documents from the log. Why enemies that are making in place of making documents? Some researchers revealed also understanding for the policy:
I’ve blended feelings about that. One argument is you are targeting a community of scholars if you choose a particular journal. It really is rational to check on whatever they have previously stated regarding the subject therefore the logical location to begin could be the journal you’ve chosen.
Now Professor Stephen John Senn of Luxembourg Institute of Health is really a statistician, he can certainly concur that the following policy regarding the log Statistical Papers is okay as it’s. I am talking about, in the event your tasks are printed in the type of a paper which is about data, you sure must cite something with this journal that is particularly significant just exactly what aided by the title, “Statistical Papers“, right?
It was the e-mail an audience forwarded in my experience, a recently received respond to their refused manuscript distribution:
Dear …., your paper has many merits. Nevertheless, provided the enormous wide range of submissions we’re getting recently we now have made a decision to give attention to documents that are linked to past work published within our log. And also this will not appear to be the full instance together with your paper because you aren’t citing articles of Statistical Papers. Moreover, the reference list is certainly not of great quality: often all pages and posts associated with the log articles are missing.Thank you for offering us the chance to consider carefully your work.Yours sincerelyChristine H. MьllerEditor-in-Chief, Statistical Papers
We contacted the EiC Christine Mьller, teacher of data in engineering at the Technical University of Dortmund (TU Dortmund) in Germany. She responded, confirming the e-mail authenticity:
“Due to your amount that is high of, we must set strict criteria, as well as 2 of these would be the quality associated with paper plus the relationship with other documents of y our log. Then we usually ask for a resubmission if the quality is ok and only Statistical Papers is not cited. But, right right right here the product quality, suggested by the guide list, is apparently dubious.”
I was unconvinced this training had nothing in connection with the Journal effect Factor (presently at 1.345 for analytical documents) and in addition puzzled the way the editors could judge a manuscript entirely on such basis as its reference formatting (“page numbers missing”). Mьller then clarified:
“we want to make sure submissions fit to your log and good indicator is frequently just how well its linked to previous operate in our log. Note as you may see from checking our published articles (the self-citation rate of SP is not higher than that of comparable journals and you may be aware that anyway only cites of within 3 years affect the IF) that we generally do not judge that solely by whether another SP-paper is cited or not. Needless to say the grade of a paper just isn’t judged because of the reference formatting. Nonetheless, we now have the knowledge that the sloppy guide list is an indication of the sloppy written paper. We believe that editors of other journals may have the experience that is same is going to make comparable conclusions. Ergo the remark from the guide area had been meant being an ongoing solution to your writer.”
That e-mail ended up being finalized by Christine Mьller in addition to other two editors that are chief Carsten Jentsch, teacher of data in economics at exact exact exact same TU Dortmund, and Werner Mьller, teacher at Institute for Applied Statistics at University of Linz, Austria.
The journal’s writers seem to adhere to these editorial that is unofficial. We looked over the very first 3 recently published studies in Statistical Papers (all incidentally from Asia), one recommendations 4 documents here, another recommendations 2, third sources 1 paper in same journal. It is the range of Statistical Papers really that slim? It’s this that the log internet site states in this regard:
“Statistical Papers provides a forum when it comes to presentation and assessment that is critical of techniques. In specific, the log encourages the conversation of methodological fundamentals along with possible applications.
This log stresses analytical practices which have broad applications; but, it will provide attention that is special analytical techniques which can be strongly related the commercial and social sciences. Along with initial research documents, visitors will see study articles, quick records, reports on analytical computer pc software, issue area, and book reviews”
Nowhere it really is mentioned that the submissions must cite some random previous papers in exact exact exact same log to suit the range. The assigned publisher administrator from Springer decided not to ever respond to my emails, and just why whenever they. The editors do their utmost to enhance the journal’s citation index.
But also for argument’s sake, if Statistical Papers is its very own field that is separate, certainly the Editor-in-Chief would be expert for the particular technology section of “Statistical Papers”? Regrettably, she’s certainly not. a lengthy a number of publications is published by Christine Mьller on her behalf TU Dortmund site, from 1984 till now, presumably her whole research production, since perhaps maybe maybe not otherwise specified. Yet just two of Mьller’s papers that are statistical in her own journal Statistical Papers, that is posted since 1960 (until 1995, even yet in German). Her namesake editor colleague Werner Mьller comes with simply two documents in this log to exhibit, while Jentsch doesn’t record a solitary book in Statistical Papers on his site.
Fundamentally, these are typically field outsiders for the obscure niche discipline technology of Statistical Papers, having scarcely (or otherwise not at all) published here on their own. Or even their very own journal’s impact element is simply too low and requires boosting before Mьller, Mьller & Jentsch ponder over it as being a place?
In the event that you had comparable experiences with editors imposing own-journal citation demands, please think over sharing these below when you look at the remark area.